Shared Chat•
GPT-4

MGF and Its Applications

September 4, 2023
Summarize the moment generating function and give some examples.
ChatGPT

Sure! The moment generating function (MGF) of a random variable XXX is a function that encodes information about all of its moments. If the MGF exists in some interval around 0, then it can be used to derive the nnn-th moment of XXX.

Definition: The moment generating function MX(t)M_X(t)MX​(t) of a random variable XXX is defined as: MX(t)=E[etX]M_X(t) = E[e^{tX}]MX​(t)=E[etX] where E[]E[]E[] denotes the expectation (or expected value) and ttt is a real number.

Properties:

  1. The nnn-th moment of XXX, E[Xn]E[X^n]E[Xn], can be found by taking the nnn-th derivative of MX(t)M_X(t)MX​(t) with respect to ttt, and then setting t=0t = 0t=0. E[Xn]=dndtnMX(t)∣t=0E[X^n] = \left. \frac{d^n}{dt^n} M_X(t) \right|_{t=0}E[Xn]=dtndn​MX​(t)∣∣​t=0​

  2. If two random variables XXX and YYY are independent, then the MGF of their sum is the product of their individual MGFs: MX+Y(t)=MX(t)MY(t)M_{X+Y}(t) = M_X(t)M_Y(t)MX+Y​(t)=MX​(t)MY​(t)

Examples:

  1. Uniform Distribution U(a,b)U(a, b)U(a,b): If XXX has a uniform distribution over the interval [a,b][a, b][a,b], then the MGF of XXX is: MX(t)=etb−etat(b−a)M_X(t) = \frac{e^{tb} - e^{ta}}{t(b-a)}MX​(t)=t(b−a)etb−eta​

  2. Exponential Distribution with parameter λ\lambdaλ: If XXX is exponentially distributed, then the MGF of XXX is: MX(t)=λλ−tM_X(t) = \frac{\lambda}{\lambda - t}MX​(t)=λ−tλ​ for t<λt < \lambdat<λ.

  3. Normal Distribution N(μ,σ2)N(\mu, \sigma^2)N(μ,σ2): If XXX is normally distributed with mean μ\muμ and variance σ2\sigma^2σ2, then the MGF of XXX is: MX(t)=eμt+12σ2t2M_X(t) = e^{\mu t + \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 t^2}MX​(t)=eμt+21​σ2t2

These MGFs can be derived by using the definition of the MGF and integrating over the respective probability densities. The MGF is a powerful tool, especially when working with sums of independent random variables or when looking for an alternative way to derive moments.

Provide the details of calculation for the normal.
ChatGPT

Certainly! Let's derive the moment generating function (MGF) for a normally distributed random variable X∼N(μ,σ2)X \sim N(\mu, \sigma^2)X∼N(μ,σ2).

Given: f(x)=1σ2πe−(x−μ)22σ2f(x) = \frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{(x-\mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}}f(x)=σ2π​1​e−2σ2(x−μ)2​ This is the probability density function (pdf) of the normal distribution.

The MGF MX(t)M_X(t)MX​(t) is defined as: MX(t)=E[etX]=∫−∞∞etxf(x) dxM_X(t) = E[e^{tX}] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{tx} f(x) \, dxMX​(t)=E[etX]=∫−∞∞​etxf(x)dx

Now, we plug in the pdf for the normal distribution:

MX(t)=∫−∞∞etx1σ2πe−(x−μ)22σ2 dxM_X(t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{tx} \frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{(x-\mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}} \, dxMX​(t)=∫−∞∞​etxσ2π​1​e−2σ2(x−μ)2​dx

To evaluate this integral, we complete the square in the exponent:

Expanding etxe^{tx}etx: etx=et(x−μ+μ)=et(x−μ)etμe^{tx} = e^{t(x-\mu+\mu)} = e^{t(x-\mu)} e^{t\mu}etx=et(x−μ+μ)=et(x−μ)etμ

Now, we have: MX(t)=etμ∫−∞∞et(x−μ)1σ2πe−(x−μ)22σ2 dxM_X(t) = e^{t\mu} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{t(x-\mu)} \frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{(x-\mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}} \, dxMX​(t)=etμ∫−∞∞​et(x−μ)σ2π​1​e−2σ2(x−μ)2​dx

Let's focus on the exponent by combining the exponents:

t(x−μ)−(x−μ)22σ2t(x-\mu) - \frac{(x-\mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}t(x−μ)−2σ2(x−μ)2​

Now, completing the square: t(x−μ)−(x−μ)22σ2=−12σ2[(x−μ)2−2σ2tx]t(x-\mu) - \frac{(x-\mu)^2}{2\sigma^2} = -\frac{1}{2\sigma^2} [ (x-\mu)^2 - 2\sigma^2 tx ]t(x−μ)−2σ2(x−μ)2​=−2σ21​[(x−μ)2−2σ2tx]

Notice that: (x−μ)2−2σ2tx=(x−μ−tσ2)2−t2σ4(x-\mu)^2 - 2\sigma^2 tx = (x-\mu-t\sigma^2)^2 - t^2\sigma^4(x−μ)2−2σ2tx=(x−μ−tσ2)2−t2σ4

Now, plugging this into our MGF:

MX(t)=etμ∫−∞∞1σ2πe−12σ2[(x−μ−tσ2)2−t2σ4] dxM_X(t) = e^{t\mu} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{1}{2\sigma^2} [ (x-\mu-t\sigma^2)^2 - t^2\sigma^4 ]} \, dxMX​(t)=etμ∫−∞∞​σ2π​1​e−2σ21​[(x−μ−tσ2)2−t2σ4]dx

The integral term now becomes the integral over a standard normal pdf (because of the e−x22e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}}e−2x2​ format) which is equal to 1. The second term (from completing the square) can be factored out of the integral.

Hence, we get:

MX(t)=etμe12t2σ2M_X(t) = e^{t\mu} e^{\frac{1}{2}t^2\sigma^2}MX​(t)=etμe21​t2σ2

Combining the exponents: MX(t)=etμ+12t2σ2M_X(t) = e^{t\mu + \frac{1}{2}t^2\sigma^2}MX​(t)=etμ+21​t2σ2

And that's the MGF for a normal random variable XXX.

Also list the MGF for standard discrete distributions, including negative binomial.
ChatGPT

Certainly! Here are the moment generating functions (MGFs) for some standard discrete distributions, including the negative binomial:

  1. Bernoulli Distribution (with parameter ppp): If XXX has a Bernoulli distribution (i.e., it can take on the values 0 or 1 with probability ppp and 1−p1-p1−p respectively): MX(t)=pet+(1−p)M_X(t) = pe^t + (1-p)MX​(t)=pet+(1−p)

  2. Binomial Distribution (with parameters nnn and ppp): If XXX has a binomial distribution (i.e., XXX is the number of successes in nnn Bernoulli trials, each with success probability ppp): MX(t)=(pet+(1−p))nM_X(t) = (pe^t + (1-p))^nMX​(t)=(pet+(1−p))n

  3. Poisson Distribution (with parameter λ\lambdaλ): If XXX has a Poisson distribution (i.e., XXX is the number of events happening in a fixed interval of time or space, with a constant mean rate of λ\lambdaλ events per interval): MX(t)=eλ(et−1)M_X(t) = e^{\lambda(e^t-1)}MX​(t)=eλ(et−1)

  4. Geometric Distribution (with parameter ppp): If XXX has a geometric distribution (i.e., XXX is the number of Bernoulli trials needed to get the first success): MX(t)=pet1−(1−p)etM_X(t) = \frac{pe^t}{1-(1-p)e^t}MX​(t)=1−(1−p)etpet​ provided that ∣et(1−p)∣<1|e^t(1-p)| < 1∣et(1−p)∣<1.

  5. Negative Binomial Distribution (with parameters rrr and ppp): If XXX has a negative binomial distribution (i.e., XXX is the number of failures before the rrrth success in a series of Bernoulli trials): MX(t)=(pet1−(1−p)et)rM_X(t) = \left( \frac{pe^t}{1 - (1-p)e^t} \right)^rMX​(t)=(1−(1−p)etpet​)r provided that ∣et(1−p)∣<1|e^t(1-p)| < 1∣et(1−p)∣<1.

These moment generating functions can be derived from their respective probability mass functions by using the definition of the MGF and summing over all possible values of the random variable.

What is the formula for the MGF of a sample mean of IID Y_1, Y_2, ..., Y_n, gifen MGF of Y_1?
ChatGPT

Let's assume Y1,Y2,…,YnY_1, Y_2, \ldots, Y_nY1​,Y2​,…,Yn​ are independent and identically distributed (IID) random variables with a common moment generating function (MGF) given by:

MY1(t)M_{Y_1}(t)MY1​​(t)

Now, let's define the sample mean as:

Yˉ=1n(Y1+Y2+…+Yn)\bar{Y} = \frac{1}{n} (Y_1 + Y_2 + \ldots + Y_n)Yˉ=n1​(Y1​+Y2​+…+Yn​)

To find the MGF of Yˉ\bar{Y}Yˉ, we first find the MGF of Y1+Y2+…+YnY_1 + Y_2 + \ldots + Y_nY1​+Y2​+…+Yn​, and then substitute t/nt/nt/n for ttt (since MaX(t)=MX(at)M_{aX}(t) = M_X(at)MaX​(t)=MX​(at) for a constant aaa).

Given the IID property and the properties of MGFs, the MGF of the sum S=Y1+Y2+…+YnS = Y_1 + Y_2 + \ldots + Y_nS=Y1​+Y2​+…+Yn​ is:

MS(t)=MY1(t)MY2(t)…MYn(t)=[MY1(t)]nM_S(t) = M_{Y_1}(t) M_{Y_2}(t) \ldots M_{Y_n}(t) = [M_{Y_1}(t)]^nMS​(t)=MY1​​(t)MY2​​(t)…MYn​​(t)=[MY1​​(t)]n

Now, for Yˉ\bar{Y}Yˉ:

MYˉ(t)=MS(tn)=[MY1(tn)]nM_{\bar{Y}}(t) = M_S\left(\frac{t}{n}\right) = [M_{Y_1}\left(\frac{t}{n}\right)]^nMYˉ​(t)=MS​(nt​)=[MY1​​(nt​)]n

So, that's the formula for the MGF of the sample mean of IID random variables in terms of the MGF of a single one of those variables.

Outline the proof of CLT using MGF.
ChatGPT

The Central Limit Theorem (CLT) is a foundational result in probability and statistics. It states that, under certain conditions, the sum (or average) of a large number of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d) random variables, each with finite mean and variance, will be approximately normally distributed, regardless of the distribution of the individual variables.

Using moment generating functions (MGFs) is one approach to prove the CLT. Here's a brief outline of the proof using MGFs:

  1. Setting the Scene: Let X1,X2,…,XnX_1, X_2, \ldots, X_nX1​,X2​,…,Xn​ be i.i.d random variables with: E[Xi]=μE[X_i] = \muE[Xi​]=μ Var[Xi]=σ2<∞Var[X_i] = \sigma^2 < \inftyVar[Xi​]=σ2<∞ Define: Sn=X1+X2+…+XnS_n = X_1 + X_2 + \ldots + X_nSn​=X1​+X2​+…+Xn​ and Zn=Sn−nμσnZ_n = \frac{S_n - n\mu}{\sigma \sqrt{n}}Zn​=σn​Sn​−nμ​

    The aim is to show that ZnZ_nZn​ converges in distribution to a standard normal distribution as nnn approaches infinity.

  2. MGF of Standardized Variable: Find the MGF of ZnZ_nZn​: MZn(t)=E[etZn]M_{Z_n}(t) = E[e^{tZ_n}]MZn​​(t)=E[etZn​]

  3. Expanding using Independence: Utilizing the property of independence, we can express the MGF of SnS_nSn​ in terms of the MGF of XiX_iXi​. This can be done because the MGF of a sum of independent random variables is the product of their individual MGFs.

  4. Taylor Series Expansion: The key step is to expand the MGF of XiX_iXi​ (centered and standardized) using a Taylor series around 0, keeping the first three terms. This involves looking at the terms for the first, second, and higher moments. Due to the conditions of CLT, we know the first moment is μ\muμ and the second moment is σ2\sigma^2σ2. Higher order moments will go to zero faster as nnn increases, under the finite variance assumption.

  5. Limiting Behavior: Take the limit as nnn approaches infinity of MZn(t)M_{Z_n}(t)MZn​​(t). Using properties of exponential functions and the results from the Taylor series expansion, we will find that this limit is the MGF of a standard normal random variable: lim⁡n→∞MZn(t)=et22\lim_{n \to \infty} M_{Z_n}(t) = e^{\frac{t^2}{2}}limn→∞​MZn​​(t)=e2t2​

  6. Concluding the Proof: Since the MGF uniquely determines the distribution of a random variable (under certain conditions, which are met here), and the limit of MZn(t)M_{Z_n}(t)MZn​​(t) is the MGF of a standard normal distribution, we can conclude that ZnZ_nZn​ converges in distribution to a standard normal random variable as nnn goes to infinity.

This is a rough outline, and the actual proof requires more meticulous justification at each step.

Can you elaborate on step 5?
ChatGPT

Absolutely! Let's delve deeper into Step 5.

We previously established the random variable: Zn=Sn−nμσnZ_n = \frac{S_n - n\mu}{\sigma \sqrt{n}}Zn​=σn​Sn​−nμ​

From Step 3, its MGF is a product: MZn(t)=E[etσn(X1+X2+...+Xn−nμ)]M_{Z_n}(t) = E\left[e^{\frac{t}{\sigma\sqrt{n}}(X_1 + X_2 + ... + X_n - n\mu)}\right]MZn​​(t)=E[eσn​t​(X1​+X2​+...+Xn​−nμ)]

Because X1,X2,…,XnX_1, X_2, \ldots, X_nX1​,X2​,…,Xn​ are independent, the MGF of their sum is the product of their individual MGFs. Therefore: MZn(t)=∏i=1nMXi−μσn(t)M_{Z_n}(t) = \prod_{i=1}^{n} M_{\frac{X_i - \mu}{\sigma\sqrt{n}}}(t)MZn​​(t)=∏i=1n​Mσn​Xi​−μ​​(t) =(MX1−μσn(t))n= \left(M_{\frac{X_1 - \mu}{\sigma\sqrt{n}}}(t)\right)^n=(Mσn​X1​−μ​​(t))n

From the Taylor series expansion around 0, the MGF of a random variable YYY (which has mean 0 and variance σ2\sigma^2σ2) can be approximated as: MY(t)≈1+tE[Y]+t2E[Y2]2M_Y(t) \approx 1 + tE[Y] + \frac{t^2 E[Y^2]}{2}MY​(t)≈1+tE[Y]+2t2E[Y2]​

Using this for our standardized XiX_iXi​, and noting that E[Xi−μ]=0E[X_i - \mu] = 0E[Xi​−μ]=0, the MGF becomes: MXi−μσn(t)≈1+t2σ22nM_{\frac{X_i - \mu}{\sigma\sqrt{n}}}(t) \approx 1 + \frac{t^2 \sigma^2}{2n}Mσn​Xi​−μ​​(t)≈1+2nt2σ2​

Substituting this approximation into our product gives: MZn(t)≈(1+t2σ22n)nM_{Z_n}(t) \approx \left(1 + \frac{t^2 \sigma^2}{2n}\right)^nMZn​​(t)≈(1+2nt2σ2​)n

Now, as n→∞n \to \inftyn→∞, the term inside the parentheses approaches et2/2e^{t^2/2}et2/2, since: lim⁡n→∞(1+t2σ22n)n=et2σ22\lim_{n \to \infty} \left(1 + \frac{t^2 \sigma^2}{2n}\right)^n = e^{\frac{t^2 \sigma^2}{2}}limn→∞​(1+2nt2σ2​)n=e2t2σ2​

But, since σ2\sigma^2σ2 is the variance of each XiX_iXi​, we know σ2=1\sigma^2 = 1σ2=1. So, this further simplifies to: lim⁡n→∞MZn(t)=et22\lim_{n \to \infty} M_{Z_n}(t) = e^{\frac{t^2}{2}}limn→∞​MZn​​(t)=e2t2​

This is the MGF of a standard normal distribution. Thus, by the uniqueness properties of MGFs, it implies that the distribution of ZnZ_nZn​ converges to the standard normal distribution as nnn becomes large, completing the proof.

Elaborate on step 6.
ChatGPT

Certainly! Step 6 serves as the culmination of the proof and leverages properties of moment generating functions (MGFs) to draw conclusions about the distribution of random variables.

Step 6: Concluding the Proof

Recap: By the end of Step 5, we found that lim⁡n→∞MZn(t)=et22\lim_{n \to \infty} M_{Z_n}(t) = e^{\frac{t^2}{2}}limn→∞​MZn​​(t)=e2t2​

This is the MGF of a standard normal random variable. The essence of Step 6 is to use the fact that if two random variables have the same MGF (over a region where the MGF exists), then those random variables have the same distribution.

Uniqueness Property of MGFs: A key property of MGFs is their uniqueness. If a random variable has an MGF that exists in an interval around 0, then that MGF uniquely determines the distribution of the random variable. In other words, if two random variables XXX and YYY have MGFs MX(t)M_X(t)MX​(t) and MY(t)M_Y(t)MY​(t) respectively, and if MX(t)=MY(t)M_X(t) = M_Y(t)MX​(t)=MY​(t) for all ttt in an open interval around 0, then XXX and YYY have the same distribution.

Applying the Uniqueness Property: From Step 5, we found that the limiting MGF of ZnZ_nZn​ as nnn goes to infinity is et22e^{\frac{t^2}{2}}e2t2​, which is the MGF of a standard normal random variable. Using the uniqueness property of MGFs, this means that the limiting distribution of ZnZ_nZn​ is the standard normal distribution.

Conclusion: Given that the sequence of MGFs MZn(t)M_{Z_n}(t)MZn​​(t) converges to the MGF of a standard normal random variable, and utilizing the uniqueness of MGFs, we can infer that the distribution of ZnZ_nZn​ converges to the standard normal distribution as nnn approaches infinity. This is the crux of the Central Limit Theorem (CLT).

Therefore, the sum (or average) of a large number of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables, each with finite mean and variance, will be approximately normally distributed, regardless of the distribution of the individual variables.

This conclusion underpins many statistical methods and results that assume normality, especially when the sample size is large.

Elaborate on the gaps in the arguments in step 6, and why we need the characteristic functions.
ChatGPT

Alright, let's delve deeper into the gaps and nuances in the argument provided in Step 6.

  1. Uniqueness Property of MGFs: As previously mentioned, MGFs, when they exist, are unique to their distributions. If two random variables have the same MGF in an interval around 0, they have the same distribution. However, not all random variables have MGFs that exist everywhere or in an interval around 0. This is a significant limitation.

  2. Existence of MGFs: While the MGFs of many common distributions exist in some interval around 0, there are distributions for which the MGF does not exist in any interval around 0, or at all. For the CLT, we need a more general tool that exists for a wider class of distributions.

  3. Convergence of MGFs: Even if the MGF of a sequence of random variables converges pointwise to the MGF of another random variable, this does not necessarily mean the sequence of random variables converges in distribution to the other random variable. This gap is crucial. The convergence of MGFs is a necessary but not sufficient condition for convergence in distribution.

This is where Characteristic Functions come into play. The characteristic function of a random variable XXX is given by: ϕX(t)=E[eitX]\phi_X(t) = E[e^{itX}]ϕX​(t)=E[eitX] where iii is the imaginary unit.

Why are characteristic functions important in this context?

  1. Existence: The characteristic function always exists for any random variable and for all real ttt. This is not true for MGFs.

  2. Uniqueness: Like MGFs, characteristic functions are also unique. If two random variables have the same characteristic function, they have the same distribution.

  3. Convergence: The Levy Continuity Theorem states that if the characteristic functions of a sequence of random variables converge pointwise to the characteristic function of another random variable, then the sequence converges in distribution to that random variable. This property does not hold for MGFs in general.

Given these advantages, the proof of the Central Limit Theorem often uses characteristic functions. Using characteristic functions, the proof is more general and avoids the pitfalls and gaps associated with MGFs.

In essence, while MGFs provide an intuitive and straightforward method to derive properties of random variables and their combinations, for results as deep and general as the CLT, we need tools that are more broadly applicable and robust, like characteristic functions.

Continue this conversation
|Terms of use|Privacy policy